AHR

  • WELCOME
  • ABOUT
    • Henry has a Masters of Architecture from UT Austin ...
  • The 5x5 House
    • 1. Overview
    • 2. Context
    • 3. Principles
    • 4. The Plan
    • 5. The Entry
    • 6. The Master Suite
    • 7. Version A / Version B
    • 8. Technical Details
    • 9. The Cost
  • WRITING
    • MY PHILOSOPHY
    • ESSAYS
    • FRAGMENTS
  • ARCH. SCHOOL
    • All Studio Projects
    • VII. AUSTIN MUSIC HALL
    • VI. Brixton Studio
    • V. One House, Four Rooms
    • IV. Santa Fe: Residency
    • III. New Braunfels: Hydrology
    • II. Austin: AEGB Headquarters
    • I. Lampasas: "Graduation Wall"
    • 0. Application Portfolio
  • CARPENTRY
    • ALL CARPENTRY PROJECTS
    • John John's Game Room
    • Front Entry, Seattle
    • Oak Bedroom Set
    • Bathroom Remodel
  • 35MM FILM
    • MOST RECENT
    • North America - 35mm
    • Japan - 35mm
  • MIXED MEDIA
    • ALL PROJECTS
  • (Re)SOURCES
  • WELCOME
  • ABOUT
    • Henry has a Masters of Architecture from UT Austin ...
  • The 5x5 House
    • 1. Overview
    • 2. Context
    • 3. Principles
    • 4. The Plan
    • 5. The Entry
    • 6. The Master Suite
    • 7. Version A / Version B
    • 8. Technical Details
    • 9. The Cost
  • WRITING
    • MY PHILOSOPHY
    • ESSAYS
    • FRAGMENTS
  • ARCH. SCHOOL
    • All Studio Projects
    • VII. AUSTIN MUSIC HALL
    • VI. Brixton Studio
    • V. One House, Four Rooms
    • IV. Santa Fe: Residency
    • III. New Braunfels: Hydrology
    • II. Austin: AEGB Headquarters
    • I. Lampasas: "Graduation Wall"
    • 0. Application Portfolio
  • CARPENTRY
    • ALL CARPENTRY PROJECTS
    • John John's Game Room
    • Front Entry, Seattle
    • Oak Bedroom Set
    • Bathroom Remodel
  • 35MM FILM
    • MOST RECENT
    • North America - 35mm
    • Japan - 35mm
  • MIXED MEDIA
    • ALL PROJECTS
  • (Re)SOURCES

better architecture: It starts with school

5/5/2020

 
Pop up, temporary housing in Oakland California, Shacks by the Freeway.
The built environment is not the architect's playground. It is our common property, and it follows that when architects operate on this common property they have a duty to act for its betterment.
Why?  Because  too much is at stake , and because architects can do something about it.  Viewed another way: the scale, quality, and availability of building stock (w/r/t transportation networks) are likely the most significant aspects of any one person’s life. Improve the built environment, and you have raised the bar for everything else.

​It is hard to overestimate how much healthy, resilient built environments enable the well-being of the population that inhabits them, especially given the increasing magnitude and frequency of catastrophic climate events and the great flows of migration that these trigger. Similarly, the rising inequity of wealth distribution that is exploding land values in certain cities is posing a crisis of 'affordability' that is destroying lives, and impossible to ignore. 

Such questions are not just for planners, policy-makers, and economists; they are absolutely valid architectural questions. The conversations in studios about form, meaning, mapping, materiality, iteration, parametrics, tectonics, typology or whatever else is hot, seem so trivial when the world is literally burning. This doesn't have to be the case. What architects can bring to the table is an ability to work creatively in difficult spaces, to resolve complexity across multiple disciplines, to advocate for quality of life and, finally, to deliver the product.
Picture
Oakland, CA — 2018
Picture
San Francisco, CA — 2018
On the whole, though, I do not find that the field has risen to the challenge. The discipline seems too concerned with its own problems, its own bizarre language, and with winning its own awards. More worryingly, it seems preoccupied with attracting attention rather than doing good work (in the moral sense), which, so often, needs to go unnoticed. I firmly believe it is the invisible, basic, utilitarian aspects of our world that define its greatness, not its glittering anomalies. 

Schools have an important role to play. First: the distinction between teaching architecture as a fine art and teaching architecture as a social science needs to be made clear. That it shares aspects of both is not license to confuse which parts are which. Following this, what I would hope to see is a reformed curriculum that does not denigrate pragmatism in favor of ‘design,’ that commits to teaching substantial technical proficiency across multiple software platforms, and finally, eschews the antiquated process of 'critiques' or 'reviews' (a thin euphemism) as the seminal evaluation of student work. Crits incentivize the wrong goals, and inculcate bad habits. We can do better. 

​Beauty, aesthetics, or "design intent," as it is known in contract documents are tools. They are not ends in themselves — their worth is conditional upon the good that they accomplish. Academics can no longer put this on hold as they teach creativity in a black box, and they really need to cut the hero worship. These two mix a dangerous cocktail in a young mind. With the privilege of being in the vanguard, Schools of Architecture must act with due responsibility. It is time that they made a commitment not just to their field but to their students, and to the world.
*

Comments are closed.

    Writing


    Archives

    January 2021
    May 2020
    October 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    May 2018
    January 2017
    October 2016
    September 2016
    July 2015

    Categories

    All
    Adaptive Re-use
    Aesthetics
    Architecture School
    Austin
    Gentrification
    Japan
    Mies Van Der Rohe
    Modernism
    Pedagogy
    Philip Johnson
    Robert Venturi
    Wabi-Sabi
    Walter Gropius
    Wood

© A. Henry Rose, 2021. Excerpts and photos may be re-published provided that full and clear credit is given and directly linked to the original content.